The card counting strategy known as the Revere Point Count (RPC) was created by Lawrence Revere and initially published in his book Playing Blackjack as a Business. It has a history dating back to the early 1970s. It is noteworthy to note that Lawrence Revere is one of the “pen names” used by renowned professional blackjack player Griffin K. Owens. Paul Mann and Leonard “Speck” Parsons were among his several aliases.

Revere and his associate Julian Braun built a total of three further systems. Their respective names are The Revere 5 Count, The Revere Plus Minus Count, and The 10 Count. The Revere Point Count is widely acknowledged as his finest work. It is a sophisticated and well-balanced level 2 advanced system that may be difficult to master but produces amazing results. Due to the general perception that it possesses a high level of force and precision, it is still used in modern society.

Due to the indices ranging from -2 to +2, as well as the fact that recording aces is recommended but not required, there is a lot to keep track of during a hand. Since an actual count, as opposed to a running count, is employed to calculate the size of your wager, additional mathematical work is necessary.

The Revere Point Count system is a balanced system, meaning that if you counted down a full deck, you would reach 0 at the end. Due to this, counting down decks is simple to practice, making it simple to understand the technique. It was developed at a time when the vast majority of card games were played with a single deck, hence it is most effective for single-deck games; but, it is adaptable for usage with multiple decks.

Exist multiple approaches to the process of counting cards?

There are a few distinct methodologies utilized within the realm of card counting.

A number of schools of thought, strategies, and approaches to counting cards can be found in the game of blackjack, which is comparable to the number of different betting methods and strategies that can be found at the roulette wheel. In the most fundamental form of card counting, each card that is examined is given either a positive, a negative, or a value of zero. The value of each card in the player’s system is then modified whenever a new card is dealt so that it corresponds with the player’s particular strategy for card counting.

Although they reduce the player’s odds of victory, low cards increase the card count in the game. High cards, on the other hand, have the opposite effect. Card counting can be done using a variety of different systems, but one that is particularly well-known is the Hi-Lo system.

In the Hi-Lo betting system, a player must deduct one point for each 10 that they are dealt, as well as one point for each Jack, Queen, King, or Ace, and must add one point for any value between 2 and 6. Due to the fact that their sums have the potential to affect the result in an unpredictable manner, values 7 through 9 have been given the value zero, and as a result, they do not have any impact on the count.

Card counting is not a guaranteed winning strategy because, despite its formulaic nature, there is still an element of predictability to it, not to mention the fact that it requires memorization. This distinguishes card counting as more of a method than a winning strategy.


As individual playing cards are distributed, a running tally is kept. The count begins at zero and increases or decreases based on the value of the card dealt to the player. Then, in order to determine your wager, you must convert the running count to the actual count.

Using this method, an exact count can be determined in a manner that is quite distinct from other approaches. In RPC, the true count is determined by dividing the running count by the number of remaining half-decks. Thus operates the RPC system. In the vast majority of other true count systems, the running count is normally divided by the number of full decks still in play.

Instead of adding the new card values to the true count when the following hand is dealt, they are added to the preceding running total. To wager, you must first convert the current running count to the real count, and then base your wagers on the actual count. After shuffling the cards, the count you have been keeping will be reset to zero.


Even though ace tracking is not officially a part of this system, if it were added, the RPC system’s performance would be considerably improved. Due to the inherent effectiveness of the method, a substantial proportion of more seasoned players believe that it is unneeded. Keeping a separate track of aces demands additional labor, and the efficiency increase that results is insufficient to justify the additional effort.


The player should wager more money when the true count is high and less money when the true count is low. If the true count is greater, you should increase your wager proportionally. If the true count is low or negative, you should restrict your wager to the table minimum. Card counting should enable you to play a beautiful, profitable game of blackjack if you utilize a betting technique that lets you maintain a moderate bet spread.

You must play the game so that the “eyes in the sky” do not find that you are card counting. As long as you don’t make irrational bet amount adjustments during play, you should be alright.


Because of the difficulty involved in using the Revere Point Count method, it is recommended that only experienced players use it. This technique has been around for a very long time, and the fact that it is still being utilized demonstrates that there must be some justification for its continued use.